The concept of visual analysis is introduced in relation to Carl Jung's opinion of the matter. We walk through Carl Jung's definitions of Introversion & Extroversion, and note the empirical nature of his observations. We then discuss how to standardize his definitions into specific markers to use for classification of people.

The problems currently facing Jungian typology, personality theories and psychometrics in general are identified. We review the current evidence for these systems, including the Big Five, and how much we do or do not know about the essence of human nature.

A series of pilot studies are examined, which show a promising new direction of research into personality through body mannerisms. These studies promise to resolve the current problems in typology, and to establish the existence of inborn/genetic psychological types.

The four energetics, which show statistically significant matches to psychology, are examined signal by signal. Afterwards, we review the distribution of energetic levels in the population, to identify what the hierarchical order of the energetics really is, from an evidence-driven approach.

The two Judgment energetics (Je & Ji) are examined more closely to identify variations within them. Could these variations correspond to the Jungian terms "T" and "F"? And does this show some evidence for the cognitive functions? We examine these questions in depth together.

The two Perception energetics (Pe & Pi) are examined more closely to identify variations within them. Could these variations correspond to the Jungian terms "S" and "N"? And does this show some evidence for the cognitive functions? We examine these questions in depth together.

Having established physical definitions for the 8 functions, we move now towards identifying whole types and to mapping the global population. In doing so, we also walk through the creation of psychological profiles from vultology in real-time through the creation of a Motif Matrix.

We examine individuals with a Senex-like, inertial, reactive and fluid vultology (Pi) and hypnotic eyes (Ni) and discover psychological correlations among them. We then begin to draft an initial profile of what these individuals are like, to use in the future to compare against new individuals.

Having now seen the TeSi type, and the NiFe type, we now look for an in between type, a Pi-lead two has Si+Te rather than Ni+Fe. Does the psychology of the TeSi get inverted in order when we also swap the vultological order of Te and Si? We see the beginnings of a cognitive structure.

Now that we have a hypothesis about a modular stacking of vultologies and psychologies together, we put that hypothesis to the test by flipping Ni+Fe around, to see what happens when they are Fe+Ni. Do we see a similarly flipped psychology, like we saw when flipping Te+Si?